[R6RS] Ensuring progress

Michael Sperber sperber
Mon Feb 2 05:09:49 EST 2004

>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <feeley at IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

Marc> Manuel Serrano wrote:

>> > OK then let's settle on 5 work days (i.e. a calendar week).  We should
>> > strive to be as prompt as possible in our responses so that the
>> > discussion can proceed in a timely manner.  The 5 work day limit is
>> > really for extreme cases (out of email contact, work overload, need to
>> > ponder the issues in depth, and so on).  So please if you can't meet
>> > the deadline inform the list that you will need a few more days.
>> That's fine for me. I agree with this approach. Hence, we need a way to send
>> mails to the mailing list that are not archived, as this one :-)

Marc> I personally don't mind archiving such "administrative" messages.  However,
Marc> if you feel this is inappropriate then just send them directly to all
Marc> the editors (create a mail alias to make it easy... or do you think I
Marc> should create a "r6rs-administrivia" mailing-list?).

I think you should, so we can get an archive.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list