[R6RS] Re: [R6RS-private] Whether we're stuck or not
Sat Aug 7 04:20:09 EDT 2004
[Switching this to r6rs at .]
>>>>> "Will" == William D Clinger <William> writes:
Will> I would also like to ask something of my fellow R6RS editors. Most
Will> of you are associated with a specific major implementation of Scheme.
Will> Please tell me how to run that implementation in its maximally R5RS-
Will> compliant mode. By that, I am referring in part to the mode required
Will> by R5RS section 1.3.1:
Will> It is required that every implementation of Scheme support
Will> all features that are not marked as being _optional_.
Will> Implementations are free to add extensions, provided the
Will> extensions are not in conflict with the language reported
Will> here. In particular, implementations must support a mode
Will> that preempts no lexical conventions of this report.
For Scheme 48, it's
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS